Lee Harvey Oswald
Days after the Kennedy assassination, Allen Dulles of the CIA had seen all the evidence he needed to conclude, “We had nothing to do with it.” That’s always been good enough for me.
The rule in MN is that you either believe the gunman acted alone or you are a conspiracy theorist. One of those conspiracy theories involves Minnesotans Hubert H. Humphrey and Harland Cleveland suggesting they killed JFK to advance their utopian Affirmative Action Plan (EO11246).
I’ve always been satisfied with the lone gunman theory. It’s simple, it’s direct, it’s clear, and most of all, it doesn’t involve the Minnesotans who brought us Affirmative Action (EO11246).
Speaking openly about Affirmative Action (EO 11246) will get you fired, ostracized, and blacklisted.
The same applies when discussing Minnesota’s 38-year-old State statute §43A.191, which mandated extra “justification” hurdles for white men in government employment.
Suggesting Minnesota corporations also adopted this policy or that there’s anything wrong with placing extra barriers to employment for white men will get you labeled as racist, misogynist, homophobic, Anti Semitic, transphobic, Islamophobe, and then get you blacklisted.
Vance Boelter
When State Senator John Hoffman (DFL) and his wife, Yvette Hoffman, were shot, and State Representative Melissa Hortman (DFL) and her husband, Mark, and their dog Gilbert were assassinated on No Kings Protest Day, I decided I would wait 72 hours to publish any opinion.
Within hours, Governor Tim Walz had concluded this was a “politically motivated assassination” and 1,000’s of Twitter accounts repeated the very precise term.
Over the next few days, the same pattern followed as we were told about a “Hit List” and a “Manifesto,” neither of which could be seen by the public.
I reached out to news reporters, MN historians, and analysts for their opinion. My analysis, “Minnesotans are nuts!,” but also predicted it would be illuminating to watch how this story was used to control the narrative.
Senator Nicole Mitchell
After a year of delays, including one for the Boelter assassination, the trial of MN State Senator Nicole Mitchell (DFL) has begun. Sen. Mitchell, who is a military commander and a licensed attorney, is on trial for [ALLEGEDLY] burgling and attempting to steal her father’s effects and an incinerated dead body from a 74-year-old widow, on behalf of Mitchell’s aunts.
The Defense’s opening statements were roughly:
1) The widow wouldn’t give it to her / stopped talking to her
2) Well, Mitchell, is just kinda’ like that
3) She sorta’ felt like it
If you think this is hyperbole, I encourage you to watch the opening statements of the prosecution and defense.
To non-Minnesotans, these might seem like nonsense legal arguments, wrapped in bad legal strategy.
As the United States Department of Justice investigation into Mary Moriarty, Hennepin County Attorney, will confirm, Minnesota justice is an intersectional grid of who is accusing whom of what crime.
Blonde White women are simultaneously the most protected victims and the most overlooked perpetrators.
When this bizarre, long-overdue trial finally began, it was the exact time the local FBI coincidentally decided to release Boelter’s letter. The letter is an “anti-manifesto” that says he did not do this for political purposes.
Instead, Boelter suggests a fantastical conspiracy at the highest levels of the military and the Minnesota Government. Correct-thinking MN Democrats will dismiss this out of hand.
With all of that said, here are a couple of things that are in evidence.
- The release of this information today distracted people from the Mitchel trial
- Boelter, who has an education degree, would have had extra barriers to employment placed in his way while being told he is “privileged” by the DFL
That’s enough to make anyone crazy.
Next Up, Aaron Rupar and the Sunni Genocide of Sherburne County Qarins
